A TOMADA DE NOTAS COMO UMA ARTE DE TRANSMISSÃO

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23927/revihgb.v.187.n.501.2026.337

Palavras-chave:

História da informação, História da leitura, Tomada de notas

Resumo

Publicado originalmente em um número voltado às artes de transmissão – ou às práticas de comunicação pelas quais o conhecimento é transmitido –, o artigo lança luz sobre aspectos compartilhados ou coletivos da tomada de notas desde a perspectiva da história cultural. Partindo da premissa de que a tomada de notas, independentemente do suporte, envolve variações ou combinações de algumas manobras básicas – armazenar, ordenar, resumir e selecionar –, a autora sugere que uma perspectiva histórica pode oferecer um terreno promissor para refletir sobre como diferentes tipos de tomada de notas impactam a forma como pensamos e escrevemos. O argumento é construído, inicialmente, a partir da Época Moderna, tomando um tratado de Jeremias Drexel como representativo dos princípios básicos da tomada de notas que eram amplamente compartilhados na Europa dos séculos XVI e XVII. Seguindo a discussão sobre Drexel, são analisadas algumas variações das práticas de tomada de notas na Época Moderna, com a sugestão de que a mudança mais generalizada ao longo do tempo pode residir menos no método de tomada de notas em si ou no lugar da avaliação e idiossincrasia individual que no papel atribuído a notas em relação à memória.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Biografia do Autor

  • Gregório Schroder Sliwka, USP

    Doutorando em Filosofia e Teoria Geral do Direito pelo Programa de Pós-graduação em Direito da Universidade de São Paulo (USP).

  • Samuel Barbosa, USP

    Professor de Direito na Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de São Paulo (USP).

Referências

AGRIMI, Jole; CRISCIANI, Chiara. Consilia médicaux. Tradução de Caroline Viola. Turnhout: Brepols, 1994.

BARZUN, Jacques; GRAFF, Henry F. The modern researcher. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1992.

BAYLE, Pierre. Dictionnaire historique et critique. Basel: Brandmuller, 1738.

BEAL, Peter. Notions in garrison: the seventeenth-century commonplace book. In: HILL, W. Speed (org.). New ways of looking at old texts: Papers of the Renaissance English Text Society, 1985–1991. Binghamton: Medieval & Renaissance Texts & Studies, 1993.

BÉRIOU, Nicole. La reportation des sermons parisiens à la fin du XIIIe siècle. Medioevo e Rinascimento, v. 3, p. 87–123, 1989.

BERKELEY, George ; THOMAS, George H. (ed.) ; LUCE, A. A. (ed.). Philosophical Commentaries. New York : Routledge, 1989.

BIASI, Pierre-Marc de et al. Pourquoi la critique génétique? Méthodes, théories. Paris: CNRS, 1998.

BLAIR, Ann. Ovidius methodizatus: the Metamorphoses of Ovid in a sixteenth-century Paris collège. History of Universities, v. 9, p. 73–118, 1990.

BLAIR, Ann. The teaching of natural philosophy in early seventeenth-century Paris: the case of Jean-Cécile Frey. History of Universities, v. 12, p. 95-158, 1993.

BLAIR, Ann. The theater of nature: Jean Bodin and Renaissance science. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997.

BODIN, Jean. Method for the Easy Comprehension of History. Tradução de Beatrice Reynolds. New York: Columbia University Press, 1945 [1572].

BOLTER, Jay David. Writing space: the computer, hypertext, and the history of writing. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1991.

BRANDT, Reinhard; STARK, Werner. Introduction. In: KANT, Immanuel. Vorlesungen über Anthropologie. 2 v. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1997.

CARRUTHERS, Mary. The book of memory: a study of memory in medieval culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

CHATELAIN, Jean‑François. Les recueils d’adversaria aux XVIe et XVIIe siècles. In: BARBIER, Frédéric (org.). Le livre et l’historien. Genève: Droz, 1997. p. 169–186.

CHAVIGNY, Paul. Organisation du travail intellectuel: recettes pratiques à l’usage des étudiants de toutes les facultés et de tous les travailleurs. Paris: Delagrave 1920.

CICERO. Pro Quinto Roscio comoedo oratio. In: CICERO. The Speeches. Tradução John Henry Freese. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1930. 2.7, p. 278-81.

DÉCULTOT, Elisabeth (org.). Lire, copier, écrire. Paris: CNRS Éditions, 2003.

DÉCULTOT, Elisabeth. L’art de l’extrait : définition, évolution, enjeux. In: DÉCULTOT, Elisabeth (org.). Lire, copier, écrire. Paris: CNRS Éditions, 2003. p. 7-28.

DÉCULTOT, Elisabeth. L’art winckelmannien de la lecture : reprise et subversion d’une pratique érudite. In: DÉCULTOT, Elisabeth (org.). Lire, copier, écrire. Paris: CNRS Éditions, 2003. p. 91-110.

DIÉNY, J.-P. Les Encyclopédies chinoises. In: BECQ, Annie. L’Encyclopédisme: Actes du colloque de Caen, 12-16 janvier 1987. Paris: Klincksieck, 1991, p. 195-201.

DORANDI, Tiziano. Le stylet et la tablette: dans le secret des auteurs antiques. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 2000.

DREXEL, Jeremias. Aurifodina artium et scientiarum omnium: Excerpendi sollertia, omnibus litterarum amantibus monstrata. Antwerp: Ioannis Cnobbari, 1638.

DURLING, Richard J. Girolamo Mercuriale’s De modo studendi. In: MCVAUGH, Michael; SIRAISI, Nancy G. (org.). Renaissance medical learning. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1991.

ENGEN, John van. The Work of Gerlach Peters (d. 1411), Spiritual Diarist and Letter-Writer, a Mystic among the Devout. Ons Geestlike Erf, v. 73, p. 150-177, 1999.

FINDLEN, Paula. The Death of a Naturalist: Knowledge and Community in Late Renaissance Italy. In: MANNING, G.; KLESTINEC, C. (eds.). Professors, Physicians and Practices in the History of Medicine. Cham: Springer, 2017.p. 155-195.

FOTHERGILL, Robert A. Private Chronicles: A Study of English Diaries. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1974.

FRANKLIN, Benjamin; LEO LEMAY, J. A. (ed.); ZALL, P. M. (ed.). Autobiography. New York: Norton, 1986.

GARAVINI, Fausta. Montaigne et le Theatrum humanae vitae. In: DUBOIS, Claude-Gilbert (ed.). Montaigne et l’Europe : actes du colloque international de Bordeaux. Mont-de-Marsan: Éditions InterUniversitaires, 1992. p. 31–45.

GIGANTE, Marcello. Philodemus in Italy: the books from Herculaneum. Tradução de Dirk Obbink. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1995.

GOYET, Francis. A propos de ‘ces pastissages de lieux communs’ (le rôle des notes de lecture dans la genèse des Essais). Bulletin de la Société des Amis de Montaigne, n. 5-6, 11-26, 1986.

GOYET, Francis. A propos de ‘ces pastissages de lieux communs’ (le rôle des notes delecture dans la genèse des Essais). Bulletin de la Société des Amis de Montaigne, n. 7-8, 9-30, 1987.

GRAFTON, Anthony. How Guillaume Budé Read his Homer. In: GRAFTON, Anthony. Commerce with the Classics: Ancient Books and Renaissance Readers. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1997.

GRAFTON, Anthony. Joseph Scaliger: A Study in the History of Classical Scholarship. 2 v. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983-93.

GRAFTON, Anthony. Les Lieux communs chez les humanistes. In: DÉCULTOT, Elisabeth (org.). Lire, copier, écrire. Paris: CNRS Éditions, 2003. p. 31-42.

GRAFTON, Anthony. The footnote: a curious history. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997.

GRAFTON, Anthony. Where Was Solomon’s House? Ecclesiastical History and the Intellectual Origins of Bacon’s New Atlantis. In: JAUMANN, Herbert (ed.). Die europaïsche Gelehrtenrepublik im Zeitalter des Konfessionalismus/The European Republic of Letters in the Age of Confessionalism. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2001. p. 21-38.

GROSSETESTE, Robert; MCEVOY, J. J. (ed.). Opera Roberti Grosseteste Lincolniensis. Turnhout: Brepols, 1995-.

HAAS, Christina. Writing technology: studies on the materiality of literacy. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1996.

HAVENS, Earle. Commonplace Books: A History of Manuscripts and Printed Books from Antiquity to the Twentieth Century. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2001.

HEESEN, Anke te. Die doppelte Verzeichnung: Schriftliche und räumliche Aneignungsweisen von Natur im 18. Jahrhundert. In: TAUSCH, Harald (ed.). Gehäuse der Mnemosyne: Architektur als Schriftform der Erinnerung. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2003.

HELMREICH, Christian. Du discours érudit à l’écriture romanesque : recherches sur les cahiers d’extraits de Jean Paul. In: DÉCULTOT, Elisabeth (org.). Lire, copier, écrire. Paris: CNRS Éditions, 2003. p. 179-197.

HOFMANN, Theodore et al. John Evelyn’s Archive at the British Library. In: KENNY, Anthony et al. (eds.). John Evelyn in the British Library. London: British Library, 1995. p. 32-43.

JARDINE, Lisa; GRAFTON, Anthony. ‘Studied for Action’: how Gabriel Harvey read his Livy. Past & Present, n. 129, p. 30-78, 1990.

JEFFERSON, Thomas; WILSON, Douglas L. (ed.). Jefferson’s Literary Commonplace Books. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989.

JORDAN, W. Die Leibniz’sche Rechenmaschine. Zeitschrift für Vermessungswesen, v. 26, n. 10, p. 289-315, 1897.

JOURNAL of the History of Ideas, v. 64, n. 1, 2003.

KENNER, Hugh. The mechanic muse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.

KERBY-FULTON, Kathreyn; HILMO, Maidie (eds.). The Medieval Professional Reader at Work: Evidence from Manuscripts of Chaucer, Langland, Kempe, and Gower. Victoria: English Literary Studies (University of Victoria), 2001.

KERGERUS, Martinus. Methodus excerpendi drexeliana succinctior. Antwerp: Cnobbari, 1658.

LABROUSSE, Elisabeth. Pierre Bayle. 2 v. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1963.

LEIBNIZ, Gottfried Wilhelm. Leibniz on His Calculating Machine. Tradução de Mark Kormes. In: SMITH, David E. (ed.). A Source Book in Mathematics. New York: Courier, 1959.

LEVY, David M. Scrolling Forward: making sense of documents in the digital age. New York: Arcade, 2001.

LOCKE, John. Nouvelle méthode pour dresser des recueils. Bibliothèque universelle et historique, v. 2, p. 315–339, 1687.

LUCE, A. A. Berkeley’s Commonplace Book: Its Date, Purpose, Structure, and Marginal Signs. Hermathena, v. 22, n. 47, p. 99-131, 1932.

MEINEL, Christoph. Enzyklopädie der Welt und Verzettelung des Wissens: Aporien der Empirie bei Joachim Jungius. In: EYBL, Franz et al. (ed.). Enzyklopädien der frühen Neuzeit: Beiträge zu ihrer Erforschung. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, 1995.

MORHOF, Daniel Georg. Polyhistor, literarius, philosophicus, et practicus: Cum accessionibus virorum clarissimorum loannis Frickii et Iohannis Molleri. Lübeck: Boeckmanni, 1732.

MOSS, Ann. Printed commonplace-books and the structuring of Renaissance thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.

PETRUCCI, Armando. Writers and readers in medieval Italy. Tradução de Charles M. Radding. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995.

PHILOMUSUS, P. [Johannis Jacobus Labhart]. Industria excerpendi brevis, facilis, amoena. Konstanz: Labhart, 1684.

PLACCIUS, Vincent. De arte excerpendi vom gelehrten Buchhalten liber singularis. Stockholm: Gottfried Liebezeit, 1689.

PLINY. Letters and “Panegyricus”. Tradução de Betty Radice. 2v. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1969.

POOVEY, Mary. A history of the modern fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.

QUINTILIAN. The orator’s education. Tradução e edição de Donald A. Russell. 5 v. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.

REULOS, Michel. Comment transcrire et interpréter les références juridiques (droit romain, droit canonique, et droit coutumier) contenues dans les ouvrages du XVIe siècle. Geneva: Droz, 1985.

ROSENTHAL, Franz. The technique and approach of Muslim scholarship. Rome: Pontificium Institutum Biblicum, 1947.

SACCHINI, Francesco. De ratione libros cum profectu legendi libellus. Würzburg: [s.n.], 1614.

SACCHINI, Francesco. Moyens de lire avec fruit. Tradução de Durey de Morsan. The Hague: [s.n.], 1786.

SACCHINI, Francesco. Über die Leküre, ihren Nutzen und die Vortheile sie gehörig anzuwenden, nach dem Lateinischen des P. Sachini teutsch bearbeitet und mit einem Anhange begleitet von Herrmann Walchner. Karlsruhe: Groos, 1832.

SAENGER, Paul. Reading in the later Middle Ages. In: CAVALLO, Guglielmo; CHARTIER, Roger (org.). A history of reading in the West. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1999.

SHERMAN, Stuart. Telling Time: Clocks, Diaries, and the English Diurnal Form, 1660-1785. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.

SHERMAN, William H. John Dee: the politics of reading and writing in the English Renaissance. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1995.

SIDELIUS, Fridericus. De studio excerpendi. Iena: Fickelscher, 1713.

SKYDSGAARD, Jens Erik. Varro the Scholar: studies in the First Book of Varro’s ‘De re rustica’. Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1968.

SMALL, Jocelyn Penny. Wax Tablets of the Mind: Cognitive Studies of Memory and Literacy in Classical Antiquity. London: Routledge, 1997.

SMALLEY, Beryl. The study of the Bible in the Middle Ages. Oxford: Blackwell, 1952.

SNOW, Vernon F. Francis Bacon’s advice to Fulke Greville on research techniques. Huntington Library Quarterly, v. 23, n. 4, 1960.

STALLYBRASS, Peter, et. al. Hamlet’s Tables and the Technologies of Writing in Renaissance England. Shakespeare Quarterly, v. 55, n. 4, p. 379-419, 2004.

STARK, Werner. Historical Notes and Interpretive Questions about Kant’s Lectures on Anthropology. Tradução de Patrick Kain. In: JACOBS, Brian; KAIN, Patrick (eds.). Essays on Kant’s Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. p. 15-37.

STERN, Virginia F. Gabriel Harvey: his life, marginalia, and library. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979.

TITIUS, Johannes Petrus. Manuductio ad excerpendum. Dantzig: Mannsklapp, 1676.

TOURNOY, Gilbert. Abraham Ortelius et la poésie politique de Jacques van Baerle. In : KARROW, Robert W. et al (eds.). Abraham Ortelius (1527-1598), cartographe et humaniste. Turnhout: Brepols, 1998.

TUMAN, Myron C. (ed.). Literacy Online: The Promise (and Peril) of Reading and Writing with Computers. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1992.

UDENIUS, Just, Christoph [Michael Kirsten]. Excerpendi ratio nova. Norhausen: J. Dauderstat, 1684.

VICKERS, Brian. Introduction to Francis Bacon. In: VICKERS, Brian (ed.). Francis Bacon. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.

VOLPILHAC-AUGER, Catherine. L’ombre d’une bibliothèque : les cahiers d’extraits de Montesquieu. In: DÉCULTOT, Elisabeth (org.). Lire, copier, écrire. Paris: CNRS Éditions, 2003. p. 79-90.

WEIMAR, Klaus. Les comptes savants de Johann Caspar Hagenbuch : l’érudit et ses cahiers d’extraits. In: DÉCULTOT, Elisabeth (org.). Lire, copier, écrire. Paris: CNRS Éditions, 2003. p. 65-78.

WEINRICH, Harald. Gibt es eine Kunst des Vergessens? Basel: Schwabe & Co, 1996.

WITTMANN, Reinhard. Was There a Reading Revolution at the End of the Eighteenth Century? In: CAVALLO, Guglielmo; CHARTIER, Roger (org.). A history of reading in the West. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1999.

YATES, Frances A. The art of memory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1966.

YEO, Richard. John Locke’s ‘Of Study’ (1677): interpreting an unpublished essay. Locke Studies, v. 3, p. 147-165, 2003.

YEO, Richard. John Locke’s “new method” of commonplacing. Eighteenth-Century Thought, v. 2, p. 33–69, 2004.

ZEDELMAIER, Helmut. Johann Jakob Moser et l’organisation érudite du savoir à l’époque moderne. In: DECULTOT, Élisabeth (org.). Lire, copier, écrire. Paris : CNRS, 2003.

Downloads

Publicado

2026-10-12

Edição

Seção

Traduções

Como Citar

BLAIR, Ann; BARBOSA, Samuel. A TOMADA DE NOTAS COMO UMA ARTE DE TRANSMISSÃO. Revista do Instituto Histórico e Geográfico Brasileiro, Rio de Janeiro, v. 187, n. 501, 2026. DOI: 10.23927/revihgb.v.187.n.501.2026.337. Disponível em: https://rihgb.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/337. Acesso em: 13 out. 2026.

Artigos Semelhantes

1-10 de 217

Você também pode iniciar uma pesquisa avançada por similaridade para este artigo.