The growth of state intervention in the First Republic and Administrative Law literature
some preliminary notes on the History of Brazilian Administrative Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23927/issn.2526-1347.RIHGB.2021(485):165-202Keywords:
state intervention, compulsory vaccination, segregating urban planning, Viveiros de Castro, Aarão Reis, Brazilian administrative lawAbstract
During the First Republic (1889-1930) and in the following years, some Brazilian legal thinkers saw state intervention as a serious risk to constitutional liberties. Initially affecting fields such as public health and urban planning, new (or just harsher) state measures were then expanding administrative action, challenging liberal orthodoxy and causing jurists to angrily react by means of lawsuits, public speeches and critical public law books. Nevertheless, new facts such as the “Vaccine Revolt”, the positive results of the so-called “sanitary dictatorship” and, particularly, the development of new attitudes towards the “Social Question” after 1917/1918 apparently led the Brazilian Administrative Law literature to become more open to state intervention as a whole.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista do Instituto Histórico e Geográfico Brasileiro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Os textos da Revista do IHGB são publicados sob uma licença Creative Commons BY-NC-ND, ou seja, é permitindo o acesso gratuito e imediato ao trabalho e permitindo ao usuário a ler, baixar, distribuir, imprimir, buscar, ou criar links para o texto completo dos artigos (acesso aberto). Reusos dos textos, como citações ou republicações devem mencionar a autoria dos mesmos, mencionar que a publicação foi realizada na Revista do IHGB e não podem ser utilizados com fins comerciais e/ou sofrerem adaptações sem expressa autorização do Editor-chefe da Revista do IHGB e/ou a Diretoria do IHGB.
